Live · Approval Required
Grant Intelligence
Matches your organization against a curated catalog of real Africa and Global-South funders, with the eligibility reasoning shown.
Grant Intelligence
Find the funders worth your week. Then draft against them.
Grant Intelligence looks for funding your organization could realistically win, explains why each one did or did not qualify, and drafts against the funder's own requirements rather than a template.
Who this is for. This one is narrower than the rest of the platform, and worth saying plainly: it is built for nonprofits, community organizations, research groups and any team whose funding comes from grant applications. If you do not apply for grants, nothing here will be useful to you, and the rest of the platform does not depend on it.
Where this lives in the platform
Every card carries its real status, read from the same registry the app runs on.
Live · Approval Required
Grant Writer
Drafts an application grounded in the specific funder you matched with — its priorities, eligibility and limits, not generic filler.
Live · Approval Required
Grant narrative sections
Writes the hard narrative sections — need statement, theory of change, sustainability — in your organization's own voice.
Live · Approval Required
Research
Sends a specialist to gather and summarize what you need to know, and writes the findings back into your workspace memory.
Matching that shows its reasoning
A list of grants is not intelligence; anyone can produce one. Each opportunity is scored against your organization — what you do, who you serve, your size, your status, the amount you are actually looking for — and the score arrives with its reasoning attached, so you can disagree with it.
- A score per opportunity, with a matched or excluded verdict against a threshold
- Plain-language reasons for the verdict, not a bare number
- Missing information called out, so you can see what would change the answer
- A recommended action — pursue now, save for later, or leave it
- Notes on real constraints, such as an award larger than your target range needing partners or match funding
Drafting that stays grounded
Grant Writer and Grant Narrative draft from two sources of truth: the solicitation and your organization. When a funder publishes its own section list, the draft follows that list rather than a generic set of headings. Where your detail is missing, it says so instead of inventing an outcome, a figure or a partner you do not have.
- Follows the funder's published sections when the solicitation provides them
- Falls back to a standard narrative structure only when the funder gives none
- Section-by-section drafting, so you can work one part at a time
- Gaps are flagged as gaps — fabricated evidence would fail the application anyway
- Every draft is yours to edit; nothing is submitted anywhere by the platform
You approve before anything moves
Grant work is delegated to specialists in your workforce, and delegated work lands in your work queue awaiting your approval. That is the same gate the rest of the platform uses, not a separate promise made for this page.
- Discovery, matching and drafting all produce work you review
- Nothing is sent to a funder or a contact on your behalf
- Research is cited back to what it read, so you can check it
Keep reading
Grow on evidence
The pillar this belongs to: research, campaigns, ad analysis and funding intelligence together.
Read moreThe whole platform
NOVA, the specialized workforce, and the approval gates in front of every outward action.
Read moreNOVA Live
Ask out loud which funding matches are worth your time this week.
Read moreBring us a funder you are considering
An executive demonstration works best with a real solicitation in front of us — you will see the matching reasoning and a grounded draft against your own organization.